Many scholars have written extensively in response to Irving's claims, providing counterarguments and refutations. For example, historians such as Martin Broszat, Hans-Ulrich Wehler, and Richard Evans have challenged Irving's interpretations, citing extensive archival research and eyewitness testimony.
Despite the controversy surrounding his work, Irving's books have had a significant impact on Holocaust denial and anti-Semitic discourse. His ideas have been influential among some far-right and neo-Nazi groups, which have used his work to promote their ideologies.
Irving's work relies heavily on primary sources, including diaries, letters, and interviews with former Nazi officials. However, his critics argue that he selectively presents and interprets these sources to support his revisionist thesis.
In conclusion, David Irving's "Hitler's War" or "La Guerra de Hitler" presents a highly contested and revisionist account of World War II and the Holocaust. While Irving's work has been influential among some circles, it has been widely criticized by scholars and historians for its methodological flaws, lack of objectivity, and promotion of Holocaust denial.
